<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Time Machine (1960) &#124; 3.5 out of 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/the-time-machine-1960/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/the-time-machine-1960/</link>
	<description>Where we&#039;re going, we don&#039;t need roads...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: onion</title>
		<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/the-time-machine-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>onion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=31#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Is the original really the best? I haven&#039;t seen this in a long while, but remember it had plenty of very dodgey sets and some strange abridged explanations of what has happened in the future. 

I&#039;d be interested to see this and the new version (with Samantha Mumba!) back to back and compare. I know the new one had plenty of dubois moments, and a buildup which was far too long, but I remember it having some really interesting scenes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the original really the best? I haven&#8217;t seen this in a long while, but remember it had plenty of very dodgey sets and some strange abridged explanations of what has happened in the future. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see this and the new version (with Samantha Mumba!) back to back and compare. I know the new one had plenty of dubois moments, and a buildup which was far too long, but I remember it having some really interesting scenes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
