Comments on: 21 | 3 out of 5 http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/21-3-out-of-5/ Where we're going, we don't need roads... Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:18:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Phil http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/21-3-out-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-18 Phil Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:10:10 +0000 http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=105#comment-18 I would of only given it a 3.5 which i know isn't a massive increase, but i did enjoy it :-) I would of only given it a 3.5 which i know isn’t a massive increase, but i did enjoy it :-)

]]> By: Moonwatcher http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/21-3-out-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-17 Moonwatcher Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:56:16 +0000 http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=105#comment-17 I think the film was pretty harmless and although spacey did nothing in particular wrong, this one just didn't seem to get close to his usual high quality. Maybe its too much to expect perfection every time... Out of interest, Phil, what rating would you give it? I think the film was pretty harmless and although spacey did nothing in particular wrong, this one just didn’t seem to get close to his usual high quality. Maybe its too much to expect perfection every time…

Out of interest, Phil, what rating would you give it?

]]> By: Phil http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/21-3-out-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-16 Phil Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:35:41 +0000 http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=105#comment-16 I liked it more than a 3/5. I thought spacey was excellent, but i thought the plot was fun and had a nice twist! I liked it more than a 3/5. I thought spacey was excellent, but i thought the plot was fun and had a nice twist!

]]>