<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cinepedia | Uk Film Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk</link>
	<description>Where we&#039;re going, we don&#039;t need roads...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Cinepedia by James</title>
		<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/about/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://85.92.86.213/~cinepedi/?page_id=2#comment-117</guid>
		<description>A film club, very interesting, you should do another one.

 I&#039;ll make sure i&#039;ll link you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A film club, very interesting, you should do another one.</p>
<p> I&#8217;ll make sure i&#8217;ll link you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 21 &#124; 3 out of 5 by Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/21-3-out-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=105#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I would of only given it a 3.5 which i know isn&#039;t a massive increase, but i did enjoy it :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would of only given it a 3.5 which i know isn&#8217;t a massive increase, but i did enjoy it <img src='http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 21 &#124; 3 out of 5 by Moonwatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/21-3-out-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonwatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=105#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I think the film was pretty harmless and although spacey did nothing in particular wrong, this one just didn&#039;t seem to get close to his usual high quality. Maybe its too much to expect perfection every time...

Out of interest, Phil, what rating would you give it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the film was pretty harmless and although spacey did nothing in particular wrong, this one just didn&#8217;t seem to get close to his usual high quality. Maybe its too much to expect perfection every time&#8230;</p>
<p>Out of interest, Phil, what rating would you give it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 21 &#124; 3 out of 5 by Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/21-3-out-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=105#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I liked it more than a 3/5. I thought spacey was excellent, but i thought the plot was fun and had a nice twist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked it more than a 3/5. I thought spacey was excellent, but i thought the plot was fun and had a nice twist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lawrence of Arabia &#124; 3.5 out of 5 by Moonwatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/reviews/lawrence-arabia-35-5/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonwatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=98#comment-10</guid>
		<description>The span of ratings at film club was very varied - from as low as 2/5 to as high as 5/5 (that was me!) Its clear this film has causes quite a different reaction in today&#039;s world compared to when it was made. 

I do think its a shame the 3.5 hour epic seems to have become unfashionable as i just cant get enough of them! Perhaps the Kill Bill/Hobbit/Harry Potter 7 style two-parter is the modern answer to a classic &#039;Epic&#039;; if nothing else it should bring hollywood some extra revenues - i guess everyone is happy at the end of the day!

....except this Hamlet/Dances With Wolves/El Cid fan.

&lt;strong&gt;Moonwatcher&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The span of ratings at film club was very varied &#8211; from as low as 2/5 to as high as 5/5 (that was me!) Its clear this film has causes quite a different reaction in today&#8217;s world compared to when it was made. </p>
<p>I do think its a shame the 3.5 hour epic seems to have become unfashionable as i just cant get enough of them! Perhaps the Kill Bill/Hobbit/Harry Potter 7 style two-parter is the modern answer to a classic &#8216;Epic&#8217;; if nothing else it should bring hollywood some extra revenues &#8211; i guess everyone is happy at the end of the day!</p>
<p>&#8230;.except this Hamlet/Dances With Wolves/El Cid fan.</p>
<p><strong>Moonwatcher</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Pie: The Wedding  &#124; 4 out of 5 by onion</title>
		<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/american-pie-wedding-4-5/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>onion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=79#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Watching this film is a very fun experience. And as it&#039;s the third in the installment of crude, smut films, I really didn&#039;t expect it to be anything other than obvious sex humour and extreme gross bits. The film does have these aplenty, but the believable characters and the well-crafted situations make it very enjoyable and more than just a cheap laugh. 

It does everything it sets out to do, which is to entertain. 4 out of 5 from me. 

The only reason why it doesnt get the full 5 is that there are characters in the film that are only there because they&#039;re in the first, and are lacking in things to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching this film is a very fun experience. And as it&#8217;s the third in the installment of crude, smut films, I really didn&#8217;t expect it to be anything other than obvious sex humour and extreme gross bits. The film does have these aplenty, but the believable characters and the well-crafted situations make it very enjoyable and more than just a cheap laugh. </p>
<p>It does everything it sets out to do, which is to entertain. 4 out of 5 from me. </p>
<p>The only reason why it doesnt get the full 5 is that there are characters in the film that are only there because they&#8217;re in the first, and are lacking in things to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Pie: The Wedding  &#124; 4 out of 5 by Kiddo</title>
		<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/american-pie-wedding-4-5/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiddo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=79#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t agree more - this is a brilliant film - I would even rate it 4.5 or possibly 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t agree more &#8211; this is a brilliant film &#8211; I would even rate it 4.5 or possibly 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Time Machine (1960) &#124; 3.5 out of 5 by onion</title>
		<link>http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/short-reviews/the-time-machine-1960/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>onion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinepedia.co.uk/?p=31#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Is the original really the best? I haven&#039;t seen this in a long while, but remember it had plenty of very dodgey sets and some strange abridged explanations of what has happened in the future. 

I&#039;d be interested to see this and the new version (with Samantha Mumba!) back to back and compare. I know the new one had plenty of dubois moments, and a buildup which was far too long, but I remember it having some really interesting scenes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the original really the best? I haven&#8217;t seen this in a long while, but remember it had plenty of very dodgey sets and some strange abridged explanations of what has happened in the future. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see this and the new version (with Samantha Mumba!) back to back and compare. I know the new one had plenty of dubois moments, and a buildup which was far too long, but I remember it having some really interesting scenes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
